Microsoft Explains Logic Behind Patching Windows XP After Retirement

May 2, 2014
31
Views

explains that the security of their products is something that the software titan takes very seriously. This, along with the fact that several companies and organizations encouraged users to abandon Internet Explorer in favor of a supported web browser is probably the reason why the company decide to fix this flaw at light speed. Throw in the fact that this flaw was unearthed so close to the retirement, and you get the drift:

“We made this exception based on the proximity to the end of support for Windows XP. The reality is there have been a very small number of attacks based on this particular vulnerability and concerns were, frankly, overblown. Unfortunately this is a sign of the times and this is not to say we don’t take these reports seriously. We absolutely do.”
At the same time, Hall makes it clear that even though Microsoft have fixed Windows XP this time around, everyone should still make moving to a newer version of the OS a priority. This, truly, is something that will not happen over and over again.]]>

Article Categories:
Miscellaneous

Mike Johnson is a writer for The Redmond Cloud - the most comprehensive source of news and information about Microsoft Azure and the Microsoft Cloud. He enjoys writing about Azure Security, IOT and the Blockchain.

All Comments

  • Sounds like they didn’t want to take the PR hit from this, which I disagree with personally. I think the PR hit is temporary. Continuing XP is just delaying the inevitable.

    Kelsy Martin May 2, 2014 11:59 am Reply
  • They can spin it however they want, but I think it’s a bad decision. You can only put a bandaid over XP for so long. Truth is, it needs much more than a bandaid. It’s an OS from over a decade ago!

    Steve Fulton May 2, 2014 4:13 pm Reply
  • I think the risk for Microsoft is that something goes badly wrong because of the lack of security patches and that, despite all the warnings to people to upgrade, the XP die-hards will still hold Microsoft accountable and complain loudly. On that basis Microsoft probably decided to avoid the pain and cost of bad publicity by the lesser pain and cost of fixing the problem.

    Rumin8 May 9, 2014 10:22 am Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *